Theory
When an acid of generic formula \(H_nA\), with \(n\geq1\), is dissolved in an aquous solution, a series of dissociations equilibrium are immediately estabished according to the sequence of reactions:
Each of the written reactions is an equilibrium characterized by a acidic dissociation constant \(k_a^{(i)}\) defined according to:
where \(1\leq i\leq n\) represents the index of the dissociation reaction numbered in order and starting from \(1\).
Given an initial concentration \(C_a\) of the acid substance, the following mass balance can be written:
or, in more compact form, according to the summation:
Using this relation one can easily express the concentration \([H_{n-j}A^{j-}]\) of each dissociation product as a function of the total acid concentration \(C_a\) and the solution \(pH\).
To show how this can be done we can start by adopting a simple observation: each dissociation constant \(k_a^{(i)}\) can be used to write the concentration of two subsequent dissociation product one as a function of the other.
As an example the concentraion of the deprotonation product \(H_{n-i}A^{i-}\) can be use to express the concentration of its precursor \(H_{n-i+1}A^{(i-1)-}\) according to:
while, at the same time, it can also be used to express the concentration of its deprotonation product \(H_{k-1}A^{(n-k+1)-}\) of the following one according to:
These relations can be chained allowing to express the concentration of each species in the dissociation sequence as a function of any other.
Using this observation one can rewrite the acid mass balance as a function of the concentration of a generic intermediate \([H_{n-i}A^{i-}]\). To do so, a two step process can be employed. All the intermediates having higher protonation states \(n-m>n-i\) can be rewritten according to:
while all the intermediates having lower protonation states \(n-m < n-1\) can be rewritten according to:
By introducting the cumulative dissociation contants:
The previous relations can be rewritten as:
where, for the special case of \(m=0\), \(\beta_0 := 1\). By observing that, when moving from \(m<i\) to the case of \(i>m\), the change in sign of the exponent \(i-m\) automatically takes care of bringing the \([H_3O^+]\) term to the denominator one can easily see how the two relations can be rewritten in a single expression that takes care of all the possible scenarios:
By substituting this relation in the acid mass balance the following result can be obtained:
From which: